OSHA Inspection: MIRANDA ROOFING

Issued

Feb 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  On or about February 28, 2017 at a jobsite located at 9705 N. Ditzler Court in Kansas City, MO:  Employees engaged in roofing activities using a Dewalt pneumatic nail gun were exposed to struck-by hazards in that eye protection was not provided while nailing shingles.

Issued

Feb 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  On or about February 28, 2017 at a jobsite located at 9705 N. Ditzler Court in Kansas City, MO:  Employees engaged in residential roofing activities from a 6:12 pitch roof were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet from the eave of the residence to the ground below in that fall protection was not utilized.

Issued

Feb 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  On or about February 28, 2017 at a jobsite located at 9705 N. Ditzler Court in Kansas City, MO: Employees were exposed to injury from an 13 foot fall hazard while accessing and exiting the roof.  The ladder that provided access to the roof on the front of the house did not extend 3 feet above the eave.

Issued

Feb 28, 2017

Abate by

Mar 21, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  On or about February 28, 2017 at a jobsite located at 9705 N. Ditzler Court in Kansas City, MO:  Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to health hazards from dermal, ingestion, and inhalation exposure to hazardous chemicals.  The employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program to ensure that employees were aware of the hazards associated with the chemicals with which they work.  Hazardous chemicals used at the site included but were not limited to gasoline.