Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HAGEMAN ROOFING

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HAGEMAN ROOFING in 16 INDUSTRIAL AVE., RIDGEFIELD PARK, NJ 07660 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342136744.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hageman Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hageman Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HAGEMAN ROOFING
Site address
16 INDUSTRIAL AVE.
City
RIDGEFIELD PARK
State
NJ
ZIP
07660
Mailing
16 INDUSTRIAL AVE., RIDGEFIELD PARK, NJ 07660
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2017
Abate by
May 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,793 · Current $1,793
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:   a) Yard Area: Employees are required to wear respirators, including but not limited to, tight fitting half-mask cartridge respirators and N95 dust masks, to remove debris from inside a 75-ton storage tank. The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program, on or about, 3/1/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1793

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2017
Abate by
May 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a) Yard Area: Employees are required to wear respirators, including but not limited to, tight fitting half-mask cartridge respirators and N95 dust masks, to remove debris from inside a 75-ton storage tank. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, on or about, 3/1/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2017
Abate by
May 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:    a) Yard Area: Employees are required to wear respirators, including but not limited to, tight fitting half-mask cartridge respirators and N95 dust masks, to remove debris from inside a 75-ton storage tank. The employer did not provide affected employees with training covering the use of respirators, on or about, 3/1/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2017
Abate by
May 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,793 · Current $1,793
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:  a) Yard Area: Employees are required to enter a 75-ton storage tank to remove residue consisting of build-up asphalt. The employer did not evaluate the tank to determine if the space was a permit-required confined space, on or about, 3/1/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1793

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2017
Abate by
May 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146:  a) Yard Area: Employees are required to enter a 75-ton storage tank to remove residue consisting of build-up asphalt. The employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program, on or about, 3/1/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2017
Abate by
May 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition:   a) Yard Area: An employee was wearing a half-mask respirator that was not cleaned and disinfected. The employer did not ensure that employees respirators were maintained in a sanitary condition, on or about, 3/1/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2017
Abate by
May 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Yard Area: Employees work with hazardous chemicals, including, but not limited to, asphalt, diesel fuel, and propane. The employer did not provide employees with information and training on hazardous chemicals, on or about, 3/1/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Hageman Roofing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342136744.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.