Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: MANKE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MANKE ENTERPRISES, INC. in 924 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE (SUITE C), LODI, WI 53555 (NAICS 488310). OSHA activity number 342137114.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Manke Enterprises, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Manke Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
924 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE (SUITE C)
City
LODI
State
WI
ZIP
53555
Mailing
PO BOX 165, LODI, WI 53555
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488310
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
Mar 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,309 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):      On or about February 28, 2017, prior to operation, the forklift operators were not trained via a formal instruction, practical training, and a workplace evaluation which exposes employees to tip over/stuck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2309
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
Mar 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,847 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    On or about February 28, 2017, employees were exposed to electrical shock due to damaged insulation in two different locations on the power chord of the Solar Battery Charger/Engine Starter 440a.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1847
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
Mar 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:    On or about February 28, 2017,  the employer did not ensure that strain relief was provided on a cable that was providing electrical current to a work bench light in the back of the warehouse exposing employees to electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
Mar 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:       On or about February 28, 2017, the electrical panel located in the warehouse on the north wall was blocked by materials preventing safe access in case of emergency exposing employees to stuck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,385 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about February 28, 2017, the employer failed to develop, implement, and/or maintain a hazard communication program for chemicals used in the workplace such as, but not limited to, CRC brake parts cleaner, which exposes to contact with a toxic substances.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1385
  • · Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
May 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about February 28, 2017, a new employee was not provided effective information and training on chemicals in the work area such as, but not limited to, CRC brake cleaner, engine oil, compressed oxygen, rainx windshield washer fluid, purple power industrial strength cleaner/degreaser, and dissolved acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342137114.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.