Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RAPID COLOR ATLANTA, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAPID COLOR ATLANTA, LLC in 801 GREAT SOUTHWEST PARKWAY SW, ATLANTA, GA 30366 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 342149770.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rapid Color Atlanta, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rapid Color Atlanta, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
801 GREAT SOUTHWEST PARKWAY SW
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30366
Mailing
801 GREAT SOUTHWEST PARKWAY SW, ATLANTA, GA 30366
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323111
Employees
25
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E09 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2017
Abate by
Sep 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $5,070
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(9)(iii): Combustible waste materials and residues were not stored in covered metal receptacles and disposed of daily:   a)  Production floor: On or about July 11, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fire hazards in that the  employer failed to store combustible waste material in metal receptacles and dispose of the receptacles daily.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5070
  • · Z (S) $5070

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2017
Abate by
Sep 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $6,338
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):      a) Chemical Room(Ink Room) and Pre-Press Room: On or about July 11, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that the  employer failed to require the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees working with hazardous products such as Film Kleen 7065 (Antistatic Film Cleaner),  DT-2R Plate Developer Replenisher, DT-2W Plate Developer , MRC-F, and Fujifilm Ink Anti-Skin LB.      b) Press #1 Paper Feeder and Press #2 Paper Feeder: On or about July 11, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck- by hazards in that the employer failed to require the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) while working within the moving range of the paper feeder using the power pallet lift and loading pallets weighing approximately 2000 lbs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6338
  • · Z (S) $6338

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2017
Abate by
Sep 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes were not available for immediate emergency use.    a) Pre-Press Room - Kodak Trendsetter: On or about July 11, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to burns to eye and skin hazards causing serious injury and impairment in that there are not appropriate facilities to quickly flush the eyes when using caustic chemicals with a pH greater than 10 such as  DT-2R Plate Developer Replenisher and DT-2W Plate Developer .
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $6338

1910.178 L01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2017
Abate by
Sep 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):   a)  Production floor and Storage Area: On or about May 2, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck- by hazards in that the  employer failed to train and certify forklift drivers in use of Caterpillar (Model #2EC25E) and Raymond (Model #10T-F45L).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $8873

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2017
Abate by
Sep 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $6,338
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed.  a) Production Area -Kluge die cutter and foil stamp machine: On or about July 11, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to caught-in hazards causing serious injury and impairment in that the chain and sprocket was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6338
  • · Z (S) $6338

1910.147 C04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2017
Abate by
Sep 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities such as servicing and/ or maintenance of equipment.  a)  Press #1, Press #2, Lantech Shrink Wrapper, and Paper Cutter: On or about May 2, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to caught-in hazards in that the employer failed to develop and implement a written Lock Out, Tag Out program which would inform and educate employees working with Press#1 (Akiyama Bestech 40), Press #2 (Komori L40), Lantech Shrink Wrapper, and Paper Cutter (Perfecta 132).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2017
Abate by
Sep 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a)  Chemical Room(Ink Room) and Pre-Press Room: On or about May 2, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that the  employer failed to develop,  implement, and maintain at the work place, a written hazard communication program which would inform and educate employees working with hazardous products such as Film Kleen 7065 (Antistatic Film Cleaner),  DT-2R Plate Developer Replenisher, DT-2W Plate Developer , MRC-F, and Fujifilm Ink Anti-Skin LB.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342149770.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.