Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: RED DEER IRONWORKS USA

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RED DEER IRONWORKS USA in 1115 16 ROAD, FRUITA, CO 81521 (NAICS 423830). OSHA activity number 342152147.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RED Deer Ironworks USA — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RED Deer Ironworks USA is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1115 16 ROAD
City
FRUITA
State
CO
ZIP
81521
Mailing
730 SCARLET DRIVE, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423830
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2017
Abate by
Jun 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,232 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed, implemented or maintained at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met:    (a)  Red Deer Ironworks USA, at 1115 16 Road, Fruita, CO 81521: On and preceding 3/3/17, the employer had not developed, implemented or maintained at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f) and (g) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, and safety data sheets will be met.  Employees performed spray finishing tasks.  The employer had not developed a written hazard communication program with regards to labeling and safety data sheets of  hazardous chemicals in their work area, including but not limited to the following:    1. Gloss Black Enamel (containing tert-butyl acetate and methyl amyl ketone),  2. Acetone, and  3. Xylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3232

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2017
Abate by
Jun 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a)  Red Deer Ironworks USA, at 1115 16 Road, Fruita, CO 81521: On and preceding 3/3/17, the employer had not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  Employees performed spray finishing tasks.  The employer had not provided effective information and training related to hazardous chemicals in employees work area, including but not limited to the following:    1. Gloss Black Enamel (containing tert-butyl acetate and methyl amyl ketone),  2. Acetone, and  3. Xylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2017
Abate by
Jun 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain a written respiratory protection program, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix), in that employees were required to wear respirators during work operations:    (a)  Red Deer Ironworks USA, at 1115 16 Road, Fruita, CO 81521: On and preceding 3/3/17, the employer did not establish and maintain a written respiratory protection program, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix) of 29 CRF 1910.134, in that employees were required to wear respirators during work operations.  Two employees sprayed Gloss Black Enamel (containing tert-butyl acetate and methyl amyl ketone) on steel pipe in an opened tent.  The employees were required to wear half mask tight fitting air purifying respirators with organic vapor cartridges and pre-filters.  The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program.  This condition potentially exposed the employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2017
Abate by
Jun 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):  The employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form:       (a)  Red Deer Ironworks USA, at 1115 16 Road, Fruita, CO 81521: On and preceding 3/3/17, the employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form.  Two employees sprayed Gloss Black Enamel (containing tert-butyl acetate and methyl amyl ketone) on steel pipe in an opened tent.  This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2017
Abate by
Jun 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested, or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      (a)  Red Deer Ironworks USA, at 1115 16 Road, Fruita, CO 81521: On and preceding 3/3/17, the employer did not did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested, or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  Two employees sprayed Gloss Black Enamel (containing tert-butyl acetate and methyl amyl ketone) on steel pipe in an opened tent.  The employees were required to wear a half mask tight fitting air purifying respirators with organic vapor cartridges and pre-filters.  The employees had not received a respirator medical evaluation.  This condition potentially exposed the employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 28, 2017
Abate by
Jun 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter:      (a)  Red Deer Ironworks USA, at 1115 16 Road, Fruita, CO 81521: On and preceding 3/3/17, the employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece was used, and at least annually thereafter.  Two employees sprayed Gloss Black Enamel (containing tert-butyl acetate and methyl amyl ketone) on steel pipe in an opened tent.  The employees were required to wear a half mask tight fitting air purifying respirators with organic vapor cartridges and pre-filters.  The employees were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.  This condition potentially exposed the employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342152147.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.