ORMOND BEACH, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: ROOF X, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROOF X, INC. in 175 ORMWOOD DRIVE LOT 10, ORMOND BEACH, FL 32176 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342158854.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROOF X, INC.
- Site address
- 175 ORMWOOD DRIVE LOT 10
- City
- ORMOND BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32176
- Mailing
- 1426 HOBBS STREET, TAMPA, FL 33619
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,802 · Current $3,297 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a. On or about March 7, 2017, employees using nail guns to install roof shingles were not wearing eye protection, exposing themselves to being struck by flying debris or nails.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3296.8
- · Z (S) $3802
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,295 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about March 7, 2017, roof area, five employees installing roof shingles on a 3:12 pitch roof system were not protected from falling 8.5 feet by a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3295
- · Z (S) $6338
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,295 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about March 7, 2017, employees were using a Werner 22 feet extension ladder to gain access and exit from the roof. The ladder was not extended 3 feet and was not secured to prevent accidental displacement. The employees were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3295
- · Z (S) $6338
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342158854.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.