OVIEDO, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: NOE ACEVEDO FRAMING CORP
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of NOE ACEVEDO FRAMING CORP in 299 CENTER LAKE LANE, OVIEDO, FL 32765 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342159571.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NOE ACEVEDO FRAMING CORP
- Site address
- 299 CENTER LAKE LANE
- City
- OVIEDO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32765
- Mailing
- 2501 BALMORAL DR., KISSIMMEE, FL 34744
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated a. On or about 11/12/2015, at Strand II, building II - personal fall protection was not attached to the basket anchor point by an employee while conducting wood finishing details from an aerial lift, exposing the worker to a 16 feet 10 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. At building 2A, employees receiving roof trusses from a forklift were exposed to a 9 feet 1 inch and a 32 feet 8 inch fall hazards, in that, fall protection was not used, on or about 03/02/2017.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jun 27, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a. On or about 03/02/2017, at the job site - fall protection training certification was not provided for employees conducting various carpentry and wood framing tasks, and were exposed to 9 feet 1 inch, 16 feet 10 inch and 32 feet 8 inch fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342159571.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.