Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANK BAADE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRANK BAADE in 1000 E. ROOSEVELT RD., WHEATON, IL 60187 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 342161635.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Frank Baade — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frank Baade is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FRANK BAADE
Site address
1000 E. ROOSEVELT RD.
City
WHEATON
State
IL
ZIP
60187
Mailing
20 LAND 325 LAKE JAMES, ANGOLA, IN 46703
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.     Frank Baade, dba BMC failed to submit documents to OSHA verifying that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Citation Number                     Item Number                          Abatement Date  01                                            02                                            04/13/2017     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 22, 2017
Abate by
Aug 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):  The employer failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Frank Baade dba BMC failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected:     Citation Number                     Item Number                          Abatement Date  01                                            1                                            04/13/17 01                                            3                                            04/27/17     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2017
Abate by
Apr 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated.   On or about March 9, 2017, employees working from an aerial lift were not protected from a fall, exposing employees to a fall of 16.7 feet.   Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2017
Abate by
Apr 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about March 9, 2017, employees walking/ working from a steel canopy were not protected from a fall, exposing employees to a fall of 19.7 feet.   Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2017
Abate by
Apr 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   On or about March 9, 2017, employees working at heights were not trained to recognize or minimize the hazards associated with a fall, exposing employees to a fall of 19.7 feet.   Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342161635.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.