FAIRFIELD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: KINGS REMODELING LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KINGS REMODELING LLC in 496 PENFIELD ROAD, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342162724.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KINGS REMODELING LLC
- Site address
- 496 PENFIELD ROAD
- City
- FAIRFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06824
- Mailing
- 20 ALANSON ROAD, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Jobsite: The poles of the pump jack scaffold from that employees were working were not braced or secured to the structure at the bottom.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1521.1
- · Z (S) $2173
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,309 · Current $1,616 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. Jobsite: The anchorages/roof brackets, installed in vertical positions and used for attachments for the personal fall arrest devices worn by the employees were not capable of supporting at least 5000 pounds per employee.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1616.3
- · Z (S) $2309
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342162724.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.