Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: GRAIN PRODUCTS CO., INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GRAIN PRODUCTS CO., INC. in 501 N. DIVISION RD, YORK, NE 68467 (NAICS 238290). OSHA activity number 342166774.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Grain Products CO., INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Grain Products CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
501 N. DIVISION RD
City
YORK
State
NE
ZIP
68467
Mailing
315 WEST 9TH ST, STROMSBURG, NE 68666
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238290
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:     The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of scaffolding that was not inspected by a competent scaffold erector prior to each use and after every move.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident during the inspection of the job site located at 501 N. Division Road, York, NE where the employer has employees exposed to fall hazards while working on scaffolding that was not inspected by the competent person prior to use or after it was been moved or altered erected.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $5070

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):  Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):   The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of scaffolding that was not fully planked on all working levels.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident during the inspection of the job site located at 501 N. Division Road, York, NE where the employer has employees exposed to fall hazards while installing a new horizontal auger and working off a single aluminum plank positioned across the top of the scaffold frame.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $5070

1926.451 B02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2017
Abate by
Aug 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2):  Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:  The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of scaffolding planking that was less than 18 inches wide.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident during the inspection of the job site located at 501 N. Division Road, York, NE where the employer has employees exposed to fall hazards while installing a new horizontal auger and working off a single wood 2x12 board substituted as scaffold planking.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):  Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with working off of scaffolding while conducting overhead work.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident during the inspection of the job site located at 501 N. Division Road, York, NE where the employer has employees exposed to fall hazards while they use the aluminum plank resting on the top level of the scaffold frame 10 feet 9 inches from the walking surface below; without the use of any form of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $5070

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a):  The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards as required by paragraph (a)(1)-(5) of this section:   The employer is failing to train employees on the hazards associated with working off of a scaffold.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident during the inspection of the job site located at 501 N. Division Road, York, NE where the employer has inadequately trained employees exposed to fall hazards while working on scaffolding.  Instances demonstrating lack of required knowledge include but are not limited to:           i.    Employees lack of understanding the trigger height of 10 feet for fall protection while working off of a scaffold.        ii.    Employees lack of understanding that all working levels of a scaffold are required to be fully planked.       iii.    Employees lack of understanding that scaffold planking has a minimum required width of 18 inches.       iv.    Employees lack of understanding that frame scaffold is required to be assembled in accordance with its design and thus retaining (coder) pins are essential in preventing structural failure due to separation of components.        v.    Employees lack of understanding that every time a scaffold is moved it is required that a competent person inspect the scaffold to ensure there is no damage that occurred in the move.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $3622

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b):  The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question including the topics as required by paragraphs (b)(1)-(4) of this section:  The employer is failing to train employees on the hazards associated with assembling, disassembling and moving scaffolding as it relates to working off the scaffold.  The most recent occurrence of this was evident during the inspection of the job site located at 501 N. Division Road, York, NE where the employer has inadequately trained employees exposed to fall hazards while working on scaffolding.  Instances demonstrating lack of required knowledge include but are not limited to:           i.    Employees lack of understanding the trigger height of 10 feet for fall protection while working off of a scaffold.        ii.    Employees lack of understanding that all working levels of a scaffold are required to be fully planked.       iii.    Employees lack of understanding that scaffold planking has a minimum required width of 18 inches.       iv.    Employees lack of understanding that frame scaffold is required to be assembled in accordance with its design and thus retaining (coder) pins are essential in preventing structural failure due to separation of components.        v.    Employees lack of understanding that every time a scaffold is moved it is required that a competent person inspect the scaffold to ensure there is no damage that occurred in the move.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342166774.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.