Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SULPHUR SHEET METAL & FABRICATION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SULPHUR SHEET METAL & FABRICATION, INC. in 1021 NORTH BEGLIS PARKWAY, SULPHUR, LA 70663 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 342169935.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sulphur Sheet Metal & Fabrication, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sulphur Sheet Metal & Fabrication, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1021 NORTH BEGLIS PARKWAY
City
SULPHUR
State
LA
ZIP
70663
Mailing
1021 NORTH BEGLIS PARKWAY, SULPHUR, LA 70663
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332313
Employees
18
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2017
Abate by
Jul 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $3,259
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section.  On or about 3/14/17 in the Process Department; the employer allowed employees to operate the Bigis HTC press brakes (large and small), and no lockout procedures were developed when the dies are changed; thus exposing employees to potential laceration/amputation hazards and injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3259

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2017
Abate by
Jul 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:  On or about 3/14/17 in the Process Department; the employer allowed employees to operate the Bigis HTC press brakes (large and small), and no machine-specific lockout procedures were developed when the dies are changed; thus exposing employees to potential laceration/amputation hazards and injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2017
Abate by
Jul 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $3,259
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed.  On or about 3/14/17 in the Process Department; the employer allowed employees to operate the Bigis HTC press brakes (large and small), and periodic inspection of the energy control procedure was conducted when the dies are changed; thus exposing employees to potential laceration/amputation hazards and injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3259

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2017
Abate by
Jul 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees.  On or about 3/14/17 in the Process Department; the employer allowed employees to operate the Bigis HTC press brakes (large and small), and no lockout training was provided when the dies are changed; thus exposing employees to potential laceration/amputation hazards and injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Jul 7, 2017
Abate by
Jul 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,563 · Current $4,563
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by POINT OF OPERATION.  On or about 3/14/17 in the Process Department; the employer allowed employees to operate the Bigis HTC press brakes (large and small), and there was no point of Operation guards when the machines are in operation; thus exposing employees to potential laceration/amputation hazards and injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4563

View Sulphur Sheet Metal & Fabrication, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342169935.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.