Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ACCUTRON INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ACCUTRON INC. in 149 ADDISON ROAD, WINDSOR, CT 06095 (NAICS 334418). OSHA activity number 342178985.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Accutron INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Accutron INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ACCUTRON INC.
Site address
149 ADDISON ROAD
City
WINDSOR
State
CT
ZIP
06095
Mailing
149 ADDISON ROAD, WINDSOR, CT 06095
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334418
Employees
104
Ownership type
Private (A)

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Nov 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $8,149
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Lead Wave Solder Area:  On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for required respirator use during set up and operation of the lead wave solder machine.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $8149
  • · C (S) $8149
  • · Z (S) $8149

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Lead Wave Solder Area;   On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to use respiratory protection during set up and operation of the lead wave solder machine.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Nov 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not ensure that employees required to use respiratory protection during set up and operation of the lead wave solder machine passed a fit test prior to use.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Nov 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that ensured that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of at least the following elements: Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators:    Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not provide respiratory protection training for required respirator use during set up and operation of the lead wave solder machine.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.213 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Nov 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $4,075 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(i)(1): Non-working portion(s) of the blade of bandsaw(s) were not enclosed or guarded:    Maintenance room;    On or about 3/22/17, the vertical wood bandsaw, located in the corner of the maintenance room, did not have an enclosure or guard on approximately 10-12 inches of the unused portion of the blade.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $4075
  • · C (S) $8149
  • · Z (S) $8149

1910.1025 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $11,408 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period:  Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/22/17, an employee working in the wave solder area was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times the PEL of 0.05 mg/m3.  The employee performed tasks such as skimming lead dross off the pot, pouring the dross into the waste bucket and processing circuit boards through the machine.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $11408
  • · Z (S) $11408

1910.1025 E01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year the employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were not implemented to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead :  Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/22/17, an employee working in the wave solder area was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times the PEL of 0.05 mg/m3.  The employee performed tasks such as skimming lead dross off the pot, pouring the dross into the waste bucket and processing circuit boards through the machine.  The wave solder machine is exhausted, however tasks such as cleaning the dross, carrying the open container and pouring it into the waste bucket are not.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1025 E03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls:  Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not have a written lead compliance program, indicating engineering and work practice controls implemented to reduce exposures to or below the PEL.  A worker in the lead wave solder area was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times the PEL.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $8149
  • · Z (S) $8149

1910.1025 F03 I C

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(3)(i)(C): The employer did not provide HEPA filters for powered and non-powered air-purifying respirators:  Lead Wave Solder Area:  On or about 3/22/17, an employee performing tasks that resulted in an 8-hr TWA exposure to lead of 0.2711 mg/m3,  5.4 times the PEL, was not provided respiratory protection with a HEPA filter.  P95 filtering facepiece masks were provided.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $8149
  • · Z (S) $8149

1910.1025 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Nov 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $8,149
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1): Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment was not provided when employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists:    Lead Wave Solder Area;    On or about 3/22/17, employees working in the wave solder area were not provided adequate personal protective work clothing and equipment where the possibility of skin or eye irritation existed.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $8149
  • · C (S) $8149
  • · Z (S) $8149

1910.1025 I02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,519 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(i): Clean change rooms were not provided for employees exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators:  Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/22/17, employees working in the lead wave solder area were not provided a change room.  When working in this area an employee was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times over the PEL. Employees wore street clothes and shoes with a smock for product protection.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $6519
  • · Z (S) $6519

1910.1025 I03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift:  Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/22/17, employees exposed to an 8-hr TWA of  0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, 5.4 times in excess of the PEL, were not required to shower at the end of their work shift.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $8149
  • · Z (S) $8149

1910.1025 J01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): 29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i):  The employer did not institute a medical surveillance program for all employees who are or may be exposed at or above the action level for more than 30 days per year:  Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/22/17, the employer had not provided medical surveillance to employees performing tasks that may be exposed at or above the action level.  An employee working on the lead wave solder machine was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times the PEL.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $8149
  • · Z (S) $8149

1910.1025 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Nov 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $8,149
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025:    Lead Wave Solder Area and Touch Up Area;    On or about 3/22/17, training in the requirements of 29 CFR Sec. 1910.1025 was not provided to employees working in the lead wave solder area and employees working in the touch-up area when they used lead solder and a solder iron the hand solder parts on circuit boards where the possibility of skin or eye irritation existed.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $8149
  • · C (S) $8149
  • · Z (S) $8149

1910.145 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(2): A caution sign was not used to warn against potential hazards or to caution against unsafe practices.  Lead Wave Solder Area;  On or about 3/17/17, a caution sign was not posted to warn against the burn hazard near the lead pot that is heated to approximately 621 degrees fahrenheit.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $0
  • · C (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Accutron INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342178985.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.