Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RUBEN GONZALEZ RANGEL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RUBEN GONZALEZ RANGEL in 8103 LEGACY CREEK DR., TOMBALL, TX 77375 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342186806.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ruben Gonzalez Rangel for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ruben Gonzalez Rangel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8103 LEGACY CREEK DR.
City
TOMBALL
State
TX
ZIP
77375
Mailing
10822 OMALLEY DR., HOUSTON, TX 77067
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    On or about March 21, 2017, at the construction site where employees were exposed to struck by hazards when operating a circular saw and a pneumatic nail gun without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1629.6
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     On or about March 21, 2017 at the construction site where employees were exposed to fall hazards of more than 6 feet while working from a home without a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2281.8
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:     On or about March 21, 2017 at the construction site where an employee was exposed to a fall when descending from the top ceiling joist to a step ladder that did not provide safe access.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1629.6
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:     On or about March 21, 2017 on the construction site where employees were exposed to fall hazards as they were using a top step of ladder as a step to ascend and descend from an elevated working surface.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:     On or about March 21, 2017 on a construction site where an employee was exposed to an electrical hazard when using an extension cord that had the outer insulation pulled back from the male end of the extension cord allowing strain to be applied to the terminal ends in the plug.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342186806.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.