AKRON, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: CALIBER MOLD AND MACHINE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CALIBER MOLD AND MACHINE in 1461 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, AKRON, OH 44326 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 342195278.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CALIBER MOLD AND MACHINE
- Site address
- 1461 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY
- City
- AKRON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44326
- Mailing
- 1461 INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY, AKRON, OH 44326
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: On or about March 22, 2017, the employer had not documented that a workplace hazard assessment had been conducted.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1108
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a. On or before March 22, 2017, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for the voluntary use of respirators.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1108
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $4,346 · Current $2,526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: On or about March 22, 2017 the company did not establish a program to protect employees involved with servicing and maintenance of machines and equipment, located through out the plant, from the unexpected energizing, start up, or release of stored energy. Energy sources included, but are not limited to, electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic etc. The company maintains and services equipment such as, but not limited to, CNC machines, lathes, and vertical and horizontal bore machines.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2526
- · Z (S) $4346
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. On or about March 22, 2017, employees in the shop who operate the Toyota 7FGOU15-BCS (Serial number 62460) and Caterpillar 0025A(serial number 55F-555-A155) powered industrial vehicles to move freight, were not given formal instruction, practical training, and an evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1108
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): The following items were not be inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections: On or about May 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that monthly inspections on the cranes, including but not limited to the Northern 15 ton overhead crane, Baker 5 ton crane, Equipment Company 5 ton, and the P & H 5 ton crane were completed. The last inspection was performed approximately two to three years ago.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1108
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.179 L03 III D
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(3)(iii)(d): Pendant control stations shall be kept clean and function labels kept legible. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to keep the pendants legible. The pendant did not have functional markings on the Equipment 5 ton crane Pendant.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: Examples of guarding machines are barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc: a. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Do All vertical band saw was guarded. The unused portion of the blade was not guarded for the portion of the blade between the sliding guide and the upper saw wheel. The unused portion of the blade was not guarded under the table. b. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the W.F. Wells 9" Metal Saw, Model M horizontal band saw, was guarded. The unused portion of the blade was not guarded. c. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Lang LGR Engraver #1 was guarded. The platform table was not guarded. d. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Powermatic Model 1200 drill press was guarded. The rotating chuck was not guarded. e. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Monarch VMC45B Vertical CNC was guarded. There were no interlocks. f. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Monarch (model unknown) Vertical CNC was guarded. The interlocks were not functioning. g. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Makino GF8-1 vertical machining table was guarded. There were no interlocks. h. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Cincinnati Boring Mill 12' was guarded. The platform table was not guarded. i. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Giddings & Lewis 5219 was guarded. There were no interlocks. j. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Wotan Cutter was guarded. The cutter needs guarded. k. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the South Bend lathe was guarded. There was no chuck guard. l. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the Springfield lathe was guarded. There was no chuck guard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3000
- · Z (S) $5070
1910.242 B
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $4,346 · Current $2,526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: a. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer exposed employees to approximately 90p.s.i. The employees were using the compressed air nozzles to clean the parts off at the tire molds in the polishing/hand finish area. b. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer exposed employees to approximately 90p.s.i. The employees were using the compressed air nozzles to clean the parts off at the tire molds in the welding area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2526
- · Z (S) $4346
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws. On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to provide strain relief to the lubrication system for the Monarch (unknown model) CNC vertical machine.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1108
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,108 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to develop or implement a written hazard communication program at the facility. Employees work with or are exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to coolants, oils, and lubricants.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1108
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to ensure current safety data sheets were on hand for employees working with hazardous chemicals including but not limited to coolants, oils, and lubricants.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to train employees on the safe use and handling of hazardous chemicals used in the workplace. Employees work with or are exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to coolants, oils, and lubricants.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet): On or about March 22, 2017 the employer failed to mark an exit "Not an Exit" for the compressor room.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment: On or about March 22, 2017, the employer failed to train employees required to wear safety glasses and gloves to ensure proper personal protective equipment was selected and utilized properly.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $406 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: a. On or before March 22, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees voluntarily using the 3M Half Mask respirator, were provided with Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $406
More inspections at Caliber Mold and Machine
View Caliber Mold and Machine's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342195278.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.