ORLA, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: MAN WELDING SERVICES, INC.
Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of MAN WELDING SERVICES, INC. in NABORS DRILLING RIG #X50; LEASE: HAY GIA 16/21 9.58 MILES NORTHWEST OF ORLA, TX., ORLA, TX 79770 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 342202736.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAN WELDING SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- NABORS DRILLING RIG #X50; LEASE: HAY GIA 16/21 9.58 MILES NORTHWEST OF ORLA, TX.
- City
- ORLA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79770
- Mailing
- 427 N. INDUSTRIAL, LOVINGTON, NM 88260
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Fatality or catastrophe (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811310
- Employees
- 83
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.146 D03 III
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $8,873
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3)(iii): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations, including isolating the permit space. On March 27, 2017, the third party contractor did not utilize the host employer's permit-required confined space and Lock-Out/Tag-Out program procedures and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations, including isolating the permit space. This condition exposed employees to caught-in and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $8873
- · C (S) $8873
- · Z (S) $8873
1910.146 F08
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $8,873
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(8): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the measures used to isolate the permit space and to eliminate or control permit space hazards before entry. On March 27, 2017, the employer or his representative did not ensure that the entry permit identified the measures used to isolate the permit space and to eliminate or control permit space hazards such as but not limited to the agitators. This condition exposed employees to caught-in and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $8873
- · C (S) $8873
- · Z (S) $8873
1910.146 J02
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $8,873
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(2): The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor verified, by checking that the appropriate entries had been made on the permit, that all tests specified by the permit had been conducted and that all procedures and equipment are in place before endorsing the permit and allowing entry to begin . On March 27, 2017, the employer or his representative did not ensure that all procedures and equipment were in place before endorsing the permit and allowing entry to begin. This condition exposed employees to caught-in and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $8873
- · C (S) $8873
- · Z (S) $8873
1910.146 J03
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $8,873
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(3): The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor terminated the entry and canceled the permit as required by 29 CFR 1910.146(e)(5). On March 27, 2017, each entry supervisor or his representative did not terminate the entry and cancel the permit when other employees other than those listed on the permit made entry. This condition exposed employees to caught-in and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $8873
- · C (S) $8873
- · Z (S) $8873
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811310)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342202736.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.