LEWISTON, ME —
OSHA Inspection: R.C. SPECIALTY FABRICATION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of R.C. SPECIALTY FABRICATION, INC. in 96 COMMERCIAL STREET, LEWISTON, ME 04240 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 342202843.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R.C. SPECIALTY FABRICATION, INC.
- Site address
- 96 COMMERCIAL STREET
- City
- LEWISTON
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04240
- Mailing
- 96 COMMERCIAL STREET, LEWISTON, ME 04240
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 C06
- Issued
- May 3, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring, motors, and other equipment outside of but within twenty (20) feet of any spray area, and not separated therefrom by partitions, produced sparks under normal operating conditions and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part for Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Locations: Spray Area - An exhaust fan motor, overhead fluorescent lights, an electrical outlet and a propane heater all located outside of but within 20 feet of the spray area did not conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part for Class I, Division 2 hazardous locations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1901.2
- — Z (S) $2716
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 3, 2017
- Abate by
- May 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Facility - The written respiratory protection program did not include all the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(I)-(ix), and was not fully implemented.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1521.1
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 3, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Facility - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before it was required for use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- May 3, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter: Facility - Employee using a half-face cartridge respirator was not fit tested prior to initial use nor annually thereafter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- May 3, 2017
- Abate by
- May 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: Facility - Respirator was not stored to protect from contamination; it was found uncovered, on the wall near a grinding table/work bench.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- May 3, 2017
- Abate by
- May 9, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): Facility - The Yale fork truck had an inoperable parking brake and back-up alarm and had not been taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1901.2
- — Z (S) $2716
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- May 3, 2017
- Abate by
- May 9, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposed an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service and an employee was using it before repairs and tests necessary to render the equipment safe were made: Shop - Grounding pins were missing from two extension cords that were not removed from service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at R.C. Specialty Fabrication, INC.
View R.C. Specialty Fabrication, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342202843.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.