LATHAM, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: BAYBERRY VETERINARY CARE, PLLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BAYBERRY VETERINARY CARE, PLLC in 637 NEW LOUDON ROAD #4, LATHAM, NY 12110 (NAICS 541940). OSHA activity number 342205721.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BAYBERRY VETERINARY CARE, PLLC
- Site address
- 637 NEW LOUDON ROAD #4
- City
- LATHAM
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12110
- Mailing
- 637 NEW LOUDON ROAD #4, LATHAM, NY 12110
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 541940
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices and protective shields and barriers were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it was necessary by reasons of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact: (a) On and before 3/28/2017, at facility, for the vet tech and receptionist/assistant holding animals during x-rays. The employer did not provide personal protective equipment for the protection of extremities such as, but not limited to, faceshield, apron, appropriate gloves, and protective shields and barriers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2716
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.141 G04
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.141(g)(4): Food or beverages were stored in area(s) exposed to toxic material(s): (a) On and before 3/28/2017, at facility, for the vet tech and receptionist/assistant storing their lunch with materials such as, but not limited to, vaccines, test kits and fluids. The employer did not train employees not to store food and beverages with toxic materials.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $1000
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure: a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to potentially infectious material. Employer did not review and update on an annual basis it's exposure control plan. The plan has not been reviewed in over four years.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not train each employee with occupational exposure in accordance with the requirements of this section: a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to potentially infectious material. Employer did not train employees in bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1096 D01
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(1): The employer did not make such surveys as necessary to evaluate the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions: a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to radiation from x-ray machine. The employer did not make surveys to evaluate the radiation hazards in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1096 D02
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2): Appropriate personnel monitoring or equipment such as film badges, pocket chambers, pocket dosimeters of film rings were not supplied to or required to be used by employee(s) as described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2)(i),(d)(2)(ii) and (d)(2)(iii): a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to radiation from x-ray machine. The employer did not provide personal monitoring to assess employee exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1096 E01 I
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(1)(i): Symbols prescribed by 29 CFR 1910.1096(e) did not use the conventional radiation caution colors (magenta or purple on yellow background): a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to radiation from x-ray machine. The employer did not provide symbols to caution the radiation hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2716
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1096 E02
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(2): The radiation area(s) were not conspicuously posted with a sign or signs bearing the radiation caution symbol described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(1) and the words: "Caution, Radiation Area": a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to radiation from x-ray machine. The employer did not post signs showing radiation area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for the vet tech and receptionist/assistant who wipe surfaces with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, isopropyl alcohol. Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- May 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: (a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for the vet tech and receptionist/assistant who wipe surfaces with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, isopropyl alcohol. Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 541940)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342205721.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.