Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: BAYBERRY VETERINARY CARE, PLLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BAYBERRY VETERINARY CARE, PLLC in 637 NEW LOUDON ROAD #4, LATHAM, NY 12110 (NAICS 541940). OSHA activity number 342205721.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bayberry Veterinary Care, Pllc for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bayberry Veterinary Care, Pllc is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
637 NEW LOUDON ROAD #4
City
LATHAM
State
NY
ZIP
12110
Mailing
637 NEW LOUDON ROAD #4, LATHAM, NY 12110
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541940
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1910.132(a):  Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices and protective shields and barriers were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition  wherever it was necessary by reasons of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact:       (a) On and before 3/28/2017, at facility, for the vet tech and receptionist/assistant holding animals during x-rays.  The employer did not provide personal protective equipment for the protection of extremities such as, but not limited to, faceshield, apron, appropriate gloves, and protective shields and barriers.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2716
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.141 G04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(g)(4): Food or beverages were stored in area(s) exposed to toxic material(s):     (a) On and before 3/28/2017, at facility, for the vet tech and receptionist/assistant storing their lunch with materials such as, but not limited to, vaccines, test kits and fluids.  The employer did not train employees not to store food and beverages with toxic materials.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1030 C01 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure:   a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to potentially infectious material.  Employer did not review and update on an annual basis it's exposure control plan.  The plan has not been reviewed in over four years.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1030 G02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not train each employee with occupational exposure in accordance with the requirements of this section:  a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to potentially infectious material.  Employer did not train employees in bloodborne pathogens.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1096 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(1): The employer did not make such surveys as necessary to evaluate the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions:  a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to radiation from x-ray machine.  The employer did not make surveys to evaluate the radiation hazards in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1096 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2): Appropriate personnel monitoring or equipment such as film badges, pocket chambers, pocket dosimeters of film rings were not supplied to or required to be used by employee(s) as described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2)(i),(d)(2)(ii) and (d)(2)(iii):  a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to radiation from x-ray machine.  The employer did not provide personal monitoring to assess employee exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1096 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(1)(i): Symbols prescribed by 29 CFR 1910.1096(e) did not use the conventional radiation caution colors (magenta or purple on yellow background):     a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to radiation from x-ray machine.  The employer did not provide symbols to caution the radiation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2716
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1096 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(2): The radiation area(s) were not conspicuously posted with a sign or signs bearing the radiation caution symbol described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(1) and the words:  "Caution, Radiation Area":    a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for employees with occupational exposure to radiation from x-ray machine.  The employer did not post signs showing radiation area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:     (a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for the vet tech and receptionist/assistant who wipe surfaces with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, isopropyl alcohol. Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2017
Abate by
Jun 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:     (a) On or about 3/28/2017, at facility, for the vet tech and receptionist/assistant who wipe surfaces with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, isopropyl alcohol.  Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342205721.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.