Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VOLK CONSTRUCTION CO.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VOLK CONSTRUCTION CO. in 11133 DUNN RD., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63110 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 342209798.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Volk Construction CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Volk Construction CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11133 DUNN RD.
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63110
Mailing
1737 MACKLIND AVE., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63110
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(d)(2): Chemical manufacturers, importers, or employers classifying chemicals did not identify and/or consider the full range of available scientific literature and other evidence concerning the potential hazards [in their workplaces]:  For the construction project at Christian NE Hospital, where dust was generated during demolition of plaster walls on the third floor, the employer did not determine the hazards of chemicals resulting in exposure to employees in the work place, including silica.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 E02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,173
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(2)(i): At a multi-employer workplace, the employer's hazard communication program did not include methods the employer used to provide other employers with on-site access to a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical the other employer(s)' employees may be exposed to while working:    For the construction project at Christian NE Hospital, where dust was generated during demolition of plaster walls, the employer's written chemical hazard communication program did not include the method to be used to provide subcontractors on-site access to safety data sheets, including for silica.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1173
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(2)(ii): The employer's hazard communication program did not include methods the employer will use to inform the other employer(s) of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplace's normal operations and in foreseeable emergencies:    For the construction project at Christian NE Hospital, where dust was generated during demolition of plaster walls, the employer's written chemical hazard communication program did not include the method to be used to provide subcontractors information on precautionary measures that needed to be taken to protect employees during the work that generated airborne dust which contained silica.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  At the construction project at Christian NE Hospital, where dust was generated during demolition of plaster walls on the third floor, the employer did not provide health training on the hazards of inhalation of silica.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 H02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide information to the employees on operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals were present (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  At the construction project at Christian NE Hospital, where dust was generated during demolition of plaster walls on the third floor, the employer did not inform employees that the dust generated during the demolition of plaster walls contained silica.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,000
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area (Construction Reference: 1926.59):    At the construction project at Christian NE Hospital, where dust was generated during demolition of plaster walls on the third floor, the employer did not provide specific health training on silica contained in the plaster dust.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  At the construction project at Christian NE Hospital, where silica containing dust was generated during demolition of plaster walls on the third floor, the employer did not provide training on measures that could be used to control exposure, including dust reduction measures such as wetting the material generating dust, installing enclosures, and providing respiratory protection according to the requirements of the OSHA standard.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.55 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.55(a): Employee(s) were exposed to material(s) at concentrations above those specified in the Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants for 1970 of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists:  An employee was exposed to 2.78 mg/cubic meter crystalline quartz silica (8 hour time weighted average), 1.36 times the permissible exposure limit of 2.041 mg/cubic meter, during demolition of a plaster wall on the third floor of Christian NE hospital on April 3, 2017.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.55 B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.55(b): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposure(s):  An employee was exposed to 2.78 mg/cubic meter crystalline quartz silica (8 hour time weighted average), 1.36 times the permissible exposure limit of 2.041 mg/cubic meter, during demolition of a plaster wall on the third floor of Christian NE hospital on April 3, 2017.   Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2017
Abate by
Jul 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not implemented for required respirator use (Construction Reference 1926.103):   For an employee that was exposed to 2.78 mg/cubic meter crystalline quartz silica (8 hour time weighted average), 1.36 times the permissible exposure limit of 2.041 mg/cubic meter, during demolition of a section of plaster wall on the third floor of Christian NE hospital on April 3, 2017.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Volk Construction CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342209798.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.