Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MEDINA'S PLASTER, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MEDINA'S PLASTER, LLC in 1200 W. CAUSEWAY APPROACH, MANDEVILLE, LA 70471 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342210101.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Medina'S Plaster, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Medina'S Plaster, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1200 W. CAUSEWAY APPROACH
City
MANDEVILLE
State
LA
ZIP
70471
Mailing
715 JEFFERSON HEIGHTS AVENUE, JEFFERSON, LA 70121
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)    On or about March 24, 2017, at 1200 W. Causeway Approach, Mandeville, LA, the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold system was fully planked. Employees were utilizing the scaffold system to apply stucco to the arch of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1521.2
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Cross braces were used as a means of access.    On or about March 24, 2017, at 1200 W. Causeway Approach, Mandeville, LA, the employer failed to ensure that the ladder extended past the second level. The scaffold consisted of four working levels. Employees utilized the cross braces in order to access the third and fourth levels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1521.2
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.    On or about March 24, 2017, at 1200 W. Causeway Approach, Mandeville, LA, the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold system was equipped with a complete guardrail system. Employees utilized the scaffold in order to apply stucco to the decorative arch of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1521.2
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $652 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.    On or about March 24, 2017, at 1200 W. Causeway Approach, Mandeville, LA, the employer failed to ensure that toe boards were installed on all working levels. An employee was walking on the second level while work was being performed overhead.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $652
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.501 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about March 24, 2017, at 1200 W. Causeway Approach, Mandeville, LA. the employer failed to ensure that employees were protected from falling to a lower level. Employees were installing stucco to the decorative foam on the parapet wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2716

View Medina'S Plaster, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342210101.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.