Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SILVERLINE CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SILVERLINE CONSTRUCTION, INC. in DUNN FIELD FAIR STREET, ELMIRA, NY 14901 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342210523.

Watch Silverline Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Silverline Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
DUNN FIELD FAIR STREET
City
ELMIRA
State
NY
ZIP
14901
Mailing
4299 NEWTON ROAD, BURDETT, NY 14818
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 3/29/17:  Workers were demolishing concrete using powered jack-hammers and sledge hammers where the employer did not evaluate potential exposure to Silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1629.75
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 3/29/17:  The employer did not ensure that respirators were used when demolishing concrete with a jack hammer and when employees were exposed to potential for Silica .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.303 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.303(b)(1): Grinding machines were not equipped with safety guards in conformance with the requirements of ANSI B7.1-1970, Safety Code for the Use, Care, and Protection of abrasive wheels, and paragraph (d) of this section:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 3/29/17:  The employer did not ensure that a hand-held grinder was equipped with a guard.   b)  At the jobsite, on or about 3/29/17:  The employer did not ensure that a hand held grinder was equipped with a rotating shaft guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1629.75
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2037.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt or harness with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 3/29/17:  The employer did not ensure that workers inside the elevated basket of aerial lifts were connected to the boom or basket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2037
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2037.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 3/29/17:  The employer did not ensure that workers demolishing stadium tiers were protected against falling between 25 and 10 feet from grade.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2037
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.850 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2037.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.850(a): Evidence in writing was not available that an engineering survey performed by a competent person had been performed prior to permitting employee(s) to start demolition operations:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 3/29/17:  The employer did not ensure that an engineering survey was conducted prior to demolition operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2037
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.416 E01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 3/29/17:  The employer did not ensure that flexible cords were not worn or frayed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View SILVERLINE CONSTRUCTION, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342210523.