Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: VENANCIO VARGAS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VENANCIO VARGAS in 1789 S. BAGDAD RD., LEANDER, TX 78641 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342214442.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Venancio Vargas for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Venancio Vargas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VENANCIO VARGAS
Site address
1789 S. BAGDAD RD.
City
LEANDER
State
TX
ZIP
78641
Mailing
8033 GESSNER DR. APT #242, AUSTIN, TX 78753
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, was not protected by protective helmets.  On or about March 31, 2017, employees were laying rock from a tubular welded scaffold approximately 13 feet high without the use of hard hats or toeboards, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by tools or materials.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1630

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.  On or about March 31, 2017, employees were laying rock on the commercial building under construction from a tubular welded scaffold approximately 13 feet high without the use of toeboards, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by tools or materials.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  On or about March 31, 2017, an employee was laying rock on the commercial building under construction from a tubular welded scaffold approximately 13 feet high without a ladder for access and using the crossbraces as a means of access, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  On or about March 31, 2017, employees were working from a tubular welded scaffold that did not have guard rails, toeboards or a ladder and was not inspected by a competent person before work began, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:  On or about March 31, 2017, an  employee was working from a tubular welded scaffold approximately 13 feet high without guard rails installed, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  On or about March 31, 2017, the employer did not ensure that scaffolds were erected by trained and experienced employees under the supervision of a competent person, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  On or about March 31, 2017, employees were laying rock from a tubular welded scaffold approximately 13 feet high. The employer did not ensure that each employee performing work while on the scaffold was trained, exposing employees to a fall hazard.  Note: The training shall include the following areas, as applicable:  a)  Any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area; b)  The correct procedures for dealing with electrical hazards and for erecting, maintaining, and disassembling the fall protection systems and falling object protection systems being used; c)  The proper use of the scaffold, and the proper handling of materials on the scaffold; d)  The maximum intended load and load-carrying capacities of the scaffolds used; and e)  Any other pertinent requirements of this subpart.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
Apr 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.   On or about March 31, 2017, employees were laying rock from a tubular welded scaffold approximately 13 feet high. The employer did not ensure that each employee involved in erecting the scaffold was trained, exposing employees to a fall hazard.  Note: The training shall include the following topics, as applicable:  a)  The nature of scaffold hazards; b)  The correct procedures for erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, inspecting, and maintaining the type of scaffold in question; c)  The design criteria, maximum intended load-carrying capacity and intended use of the scaffold; d)  Any other pertinent requirements of this subpart.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342214442.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.