BROOKFIELD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: MAREK SZCZUBELEK
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MAREK SZCZUBELEK in 7 STATION RD., BROOKFIELD, CT 06804 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342220530.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAREK SZCZUBELEK
- Site address
- 7 STATION RD.
- City
- BROOKFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06804
- Mailing
- 50 WIKLUND AVENUE, STRATFORD, CT 06614
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.304 I01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(i)(1): Each circular hand-fed rip saw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw blade above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the circular hand-fed rip saw that was used by employees to rip/cut trim boards was guarded with a hood that completely enclosed the portion of the saw above the table.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1901.2
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,662 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was working on the residential roof was protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2662.1
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2017
- Abate by
- May 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was exposed to fall hazards while working on the residential roof at a height above 6 feet was trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342220530.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.