Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: CISNEROS PLASTERING LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CISNEROS PLASTERING LLC in 979 FLAMEVINE LANE, VERO BEACH, FL 32963 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342223906.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cisneros Plastering LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cisneros Plastering LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
979 FLAMEVINE LANE
City
VERO BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32963
Mailing
882 JAMAICA AVENUE, SEBASTIAN, FL 32958
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):     On or about April 4, 2017, at the above addressed site, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 7 foot 6 inches and 20 feet when performing masonry work on a fabricated frame scaffold that did not have the work level platforms fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1629.6
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    On or about April 4, 2017, at the above addressed site, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 7 feet 6 inches and 20 feet when performing masonry work on a fabricated frame scaffold prior to being provided with training for the hazards associated with scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:     On or about April 4, 2017, at the above addressed site, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 7 feet 6 inches and 20 feet when performing masonry work on a fabricated frame scaffold that did not have the frame legs bearing on baseplates and/or mudsills.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1629.6
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:     On or about April 4, 2017, at the above addressed site, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 7 feet 6 inches and 20 feet when gaining access to and from the work level platform of a fabricated frame scaffold to perform masonry work while not having a safe means of egress.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1629.6
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:      On or about April 4, 2017, at the above addressed site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet when performing masonry work on a fabricated frame scaffold while not being protected from falling to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1629.6
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:     On or about April 4, 2017, at the above addressed site, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 7 feet 6 inches and 20 feet when performing masonry work on a fabricated frame scaffold that was not erected by a competent person in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 27, 2017
Abate by
May 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about April 4, 2017, at the above addressed site, employees were to the hazards associated with chemicals including but not limited to Gasoline and Rinker Stucco Cement where the employer did not develop, implement or maintain a hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342223906.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.