Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ALAMO PLATING & METAL FINISHING, LTD.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALAMO PLATING & METAL FINISHING, LTD. in 9230 CONVERSE BUSINESS LANE, CONVERSE, TX 78109 (NAICS 332618). OSHA activity number 342226586.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alamo Plating & Metal Finishing, LTD. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alamo Plating & Metal Finishing, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9230 CONVERSE BUSINESS LANE
City
CONVERSE
State
TX
ZIP
78109
Mailing
9230 CONVERSE BUSINESS LN., CONVERSE, TX 78109
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332618
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Aug 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):     In Building 9230 and 9234: On or about April 5, 2017, and times prior thereto, employee(s) were exposed to chemical hazards, while performing electroplating, plating, polishing, and anodizing without assessing the workplace to determine what type of personal protective equipment was required.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $815
  • · Z (S) $1630

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Aug 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,087 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:     In buildings 9230 and 9240: On or about April 4, 2017, and times prior thereto, employee(s) were exposed to respiratory hazards when required to wear respirators without having a written respiratory program, while electroplating, painting, polishing, and anodizing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1086.5
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Aug 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:         In buildings 9230 and 9240: On or about April 5, 2017, and times prior thereto, employee(s) were exposed to chemical hazards, while required to add caustic soda and sulfuric acid into a tank without having accessible emergency eye wash stations in the work areas.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1901.5
  • · Z (S) $3803

1910.305 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Aug 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,086 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Openings through which conductors entered cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:     In the water treatment room: On or about April 5, 2017, and times prior thereto, employee(s) were exposed to electrical hazards from the electrical junction boxes above the chemical tanks, which did not have a complete cover to prevent the conductors from being exposed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1086
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.25 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 4, 2017
Abate by
Aug 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.25(b)(1): The employer failed to provided handrails on a stairway:    Adjacent to nickel agitator tank: On or about April 5, 2017, and times prior thereto, employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard while using a stairway to reach a lower work area, that did not have a handrail.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Alamo Plating & Metal Finishing, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342226586.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.