Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CASEY DEVELOPMENT LTD.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CASEY DEVELOPMENT LTD. in 4306 N QUINLEN PARK ROAD BUILDING 10, AUSTIN, TX 78732 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 342228103.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Casey Development LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Casey Development LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4306 N QUINLEN PARK ROAD BUILDING 10
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78732
Mailing
200 EAST BASSE ROAD SUITE 300, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2017
Abate by
Apr 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,422 · Current $2,053 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about 5 April 2017, and at times prior thereto, workers performing construction activities within apartment Building 10 did so without the balconies and breezeways having some form of fall protection, exposing the workers to a fall hazard of approximately 40 feet or more.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2053.2
  • — Z (S) $3422

1926.1052 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2017
Abate by
Apr 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,933 · Current $1,760 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(a)(3): Riser height and/or tread depth was not uniform within each flight of stairs, including any foundation structure used as one or more treads of the stairs.  On or about 5 April 2017, and at times prior thereto, workers performing construction activities within apartment Building 10 were able to use a set of stairs from the 2nd floor to the 3rd floor in which the stairs were missing two treads near the 3rd floor landing, exposing the workers to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet 10 inches or more to the landing below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1759.8
  • — Z (S) $2933

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2017
Abate by
Apr 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge.  On or about 5 April 2017, and at times prior thereto, workers performing construction activities within apartment Building 10 were able to use a set of stairs from the 2nd floor to the 3rd floor in which the stairs were missing the railing between the 2nd floor half-landing and the 3rd floor landing, exposing the workers to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet 10 inches or more to the landing below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 10, 2017
Abate by
Apr 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12): Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems that meet the criteria contained in Subpart M of 29 CFR 1926.  On or about 5 April 2017, and at times prior thereto, workers performing construction activities within apartment Building 10 were able to use a set of stairs in which the railing at the 3rd floor landing was missing, exposing the workers to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet 10 inches or more to the landing below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Casey Development LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342228103.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.