PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: SIMMONS GENERAL CONTRACTING CO.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SIMMONS GENERAL CONTRACTING CO. in LOT 9, INLET ISLE DRIVE, PANAMA CITY BEACH, FL 32401 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342228335.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SIMMONS GENERAL CONTRACTING CO.
- Site address
- LOT 9, INLET ISLE DRIVE
- City
- PANAMA CITY BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32401
- Mailing
- 58 HORSESHOE LANE, FREEPORT, FL 32439
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $1,955 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles: a. On or about April 6, 2017, on top of a structure, two employees were using pneumatic nail guns to secure metal roofing material without safety glasses, exposing themselves to being hit by nails or flying debris.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1955.4
- · Z (S) $3259
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about April 6, 2017, on a 6:12 pitch roof, four employees performing roofing operations were not protected from a 35-foot fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any alternative fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2281.8
- · Z (S) $3803
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342228335.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.