OSHA Inspection: MARIO MAJER

Issued

Apr 18, 2017

Abate by

May 12, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    The employer did not ensure that employees working at the ground level were equipped with protective helmets while working in areas where shingles and other roofing materials were being ejected from the roof.

Issued

Apr 18, 2017

Abate by

May 12, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    The employer did not ensure that employees performing roofing activities with pneumatic nail guns were equipped with appropriate eye protection while being exposed to the hazard of flying particles.

Issued

Apr 18, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of subsection 1926.502:    The employer did not ensure that fall protection was implemented when employees were removing and installing asphalt shingles on residential structures, exposing them to fall hazards from 8 feet and greater.

Issued

Apr 18, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    The employer did not ensure that portable ladders used to gain access to the roof level of residential structures 8 feet and greater were extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface being accessed, exposing employees to fall hazards.