FORT LAUDERDALE, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: GERALDO CAMACHO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GERALDO CAMACHO in 307 SEVEN ISLES DRIVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342229382.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GERALDO CAMACHO
- Site address
- 307 SEVEN ISLES DRIVE
- City
- FORT LAUDERDALE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33301
- Mailing
- 2731 NE 2ND AVE., POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $406 · Current $406
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. On or about 4/04/2017, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective actions for citation 1 item 2 issued on 6/12/2017 with abatement due on 6/29/2017.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $406
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $5,070
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about 4/04/2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were engaged in roofing activities at approximately 21 feet above ground without a means of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $5070
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $5,070
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about 4/04/2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were no trained in the recognition and the hazard of a fall from a roof at approximately 21 feet above ground.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $5070
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342229382.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.