Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LINO PAEZ

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LINO PAEZ in 6560 MCFARLAND, EL PASO, TX 79906 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 342231206.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lino Paez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lino Paez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LINO PAEZ
Site address
6560 MCFARLAND
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79906
Mailing
626 DELHI, SOCORRO, TX 79927
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    Construction site:  On or about April 7, 2017, the employer did not ensure a scaffold located on top of a balcony was erected under the supervision of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection.  This condition exposed employees to fall hazards over 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.501 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2017
Abate by
May 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(a)(2): The employer did not determine if the walking/working surfaces on which its employees were to work had the strength and structural integrity to support employees safely:    Construction Site:  On or about April 7, 2017, the employer did not ensure a balcony they were working on had appropriate strength and structural integrity to support the employees.  This condition exposed employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    Construction Site:  On or about April 7, 2017, the employer did not ensure employees were protected by a fall protection system while working on a balcony.  This condition exposed employees to a fall hazard above 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3259

View Lino Paez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342231206.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.