OSHA Inspection: CHRIS MOORE

Issued

May 8, 2017

Abate by

May 23, 2017

Penalty

Initial $3,422 · Current $3,422

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)     On or about April 7, 2017, Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Paris, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the job site for unsafe activity and took necessary steps to eliminate or control the hazards.

Issued

May 8, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.     On or about April 7, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10ft. on a construction site in Paris, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure the use of fall protection.

Issued

May 8, 2017

Abate by

May 23, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,445 · Current $2,445

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:    On or about April 7, 2017, Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to electrical hazards on a construction site in Paris, Illinois, the employees were removing shingles around the energized weatherhead and the employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards.

Issued

May 8, 2017

Abate by

May 23, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:    On or about April 7, 2017, Employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to electrical hazards on a construction site in Paris, Illinois, the employees were removing shingles around the energized weatherhead and the employer did not ensure that the employee was protected by de-energizing or effectively guarding the energized power lines.

Issued

May 8, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,445 · Current $2,445

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:     On or about April 7, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Paris, Illinois, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.

Issued

May 8, 2017

Abate by

May 23, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:     On or about April 7, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while accessing the work area via an extension ladder on a construction site in Paris, Illinois. The employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.