DOVER, NH —
OSHA Inspection: NAILED IT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NAILED IT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION in 1 HOMESTEAD LANE, DOVER, NH 03820 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342241882.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NAILED IT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
- Site address
- 1 HOMESTEAD LANE
- City
- DOVER
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03820
- Mailing
- 29 WAMESIT STREET, LOWELL, MA 01851
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): a. Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer failed to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1500
- — C (S) $3803
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where the employer failed to have a competent person inspect the scaffold for defects.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where the employer failed to have a competent person erect the scaffold.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B15
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where two of the aluminum extension ladders supporting the scaffold were damaged.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where two of the aluminum extension ladders supporting the scaffold were damaged including a broken rung and a split side rail.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. Site- An employee working from the ground was not protected from a struck by hazard where the employer failed to require the wearing of head protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1500
- — C (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a. Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where the employer failed to require the wearing of eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 B02 I
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where a 2 inch by 10 inch wooden plank was used as a work platform.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2500
- — C (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.452 K05
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Ladder jack scaffold platforms were bridged one to another: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where two scaffold platforms were bridged over common ladder jack support.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to fall of 13 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3803
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. Site- Employees working from a roof were exposed to falls between 20 and 10 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where the employer failed to provide each employee with scaffold training.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $2716
More inspections at Nailed IT Construction Corporation
View Nailed IT Construction Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342241882.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.