Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BMD CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BMD CONSTRUCTION in 101 PELHAM DRIVE, DE WITT, NY 13214 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342246063.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BMD Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BMD Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BMD CONSTRUCTION
Site address
101 PELHAM DRIVE
City
DE WITT
State
NY
ZIP
13214
Mailing
306 NORTH EDWARDS STREET, SYRACUSE, NY 13206
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $333 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions:       a) West side of building, on or about 4-12-17:  Two employees were working below three employees working overhead, without head protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $333.33
  • — C (S) $1630
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.404 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $333 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupters for personal protection:       a) East (back) wall of garage, on or about 4-12-17:  Employees were operating a portable compressor, powered through a receptacle that was not protected by a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI).       b) West wall of sun porch, on or about 4-12-17:  Employees were operating a hand held circular saw, powered through a receptacle that was not protected by a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $333.33
  • — C (S) $2173
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    a) East (back) wall of garage, on or about 4-12-17:  Employees were operating a portable compressor, powered through a receptacle that did not have a continuous path to ground due to it being a two wire system without ground as well as a missing ground pin.     b) West wall of sun porch, on or about 4-12-17:  Employees were operating a hand held circular saw, powered through a receptacle that did not have a continuous path to ground due to it being a two wire system with no ground.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $333 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):       a) West and south sides of the roof, on or about 4-12-17:  Four employees were performing roofing work on a sloped roof (6:12 pitch) and were not protected from falls, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 19 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $333.34
  • — C (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $2716

View BMD Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342246063.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.