Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LIQUID WASTE TECHNOLOGY, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LIQUID WASTE TECHNOLOGY, LLC. in 1750 MADISON AVENUE, NEW RICHMOND, WI 54017 (NAICS 333120). OSHA activity number 342246246.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Liquid Waste Technology, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Liquid Waste Technology, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1750 MADISON AVENUE
City
NEW RICHMOND
State
WI
ZIP
54017
Mailing
1750 MADISON AVENUE, NEW RICHMOND, WI 54017
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333120
Employees
64
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2017
Abate by
Jul 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,549 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:      (b) Throughout the facility, Bay 3 & 4; The employer did not identify and evaluate employees exposure to respiratory hazards during welding processes.     (c) Bay 5; The employer did not identify and evaluate employees exposure to respiratory hazards during welding and painting processes in confined spaces of the dredges.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3549
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2017
Abate by
Jul 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,661 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) Throughout the facility; Medical evaluations were not provided prior to use to determine employees ability to use half-mask respirators while employees were cleaning inside of the dredge tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2661
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2017
Abate by
Jul 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) Throughout the facility; Employees required to wear half-mask respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator while employees were cleaning inside of the dredge tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2017
Abate by
Jul 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,549 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a) Bay 3, Krras Machine Press Brake (s/n 8258);  The press brake was operated with a foot control without guarding the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3549
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2017
Abate by
Jul 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $1,901 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:     (a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not maintain copies of safety data sheets for ABC3 Marine Antifouling Paint, Amerlock 2/400 Pearl Gray Resin, and Amerlock 2 Cure in the workplace to ensure employees could review and have access to them prior to and during the use of these chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1901
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2017
Abate by
Jul 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a) Throughout the facility; The employer did not provide training to employees exposed to ABC3 Marine Antifouling Paint, Amerlock 2/400 Pearl Gray Resin, and Amerlock 2 Cure prior to initial use on-site to ensure proper engineering controls, workpractices, and personal protective equipment was provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C05 II C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2017
Abate by
Jul 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii)(C): Employees entered into permit spaces that met the conditions set forth in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(i) but before an employee entered the space, the internal atmosphere was not tested with a calibrated direct-reading instrument:   (a) Bay 5, Job 1144; A permit required confined space was entered on April 11, 2017, no calibration documentation could be provided for the direct-reading instrument utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.252 C01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 19, 2017
Abate by
Jul 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(c)(1)(iv): The employer did not include the potentially hazardous materials employed in fluxes, coatings, coverings, and filler metals, all of which are potentially used in welding and cutting, in the program established to comply with Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (sec. 1910.1200):     (a) Welding Area(s), Bays 3-4; The employer did not include the elements of the hazards associated with welding and cutting in their written Hazard Communication Program and training elements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342246246.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.