Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SUPREME CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SUPREME CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 4460 LEE AVE., BATON ROUGE, LA 70809 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342246667.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Supreme Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Supreme Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4460 LEE AVE.
City
BATON ROUGE
State
LA
ZIP
70809
Mailing
POB 87257, BATON ROUGE, LA 70879
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2017
Abate by
Aug 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii).    4460 Lee Ave., Baton Rouge, LA:  On or about April 13, 2017, employees were preforming stucco operations from the second buck of a scaffold that was not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1811
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2017
Abate by
Aug 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    4460 Lee Ave., Baton Rouge, LA (front of building):  The employer did not ensure that the scaffold legs were equipped with mud sills or base plates.  The scaffold legs rested on a piece of wire mesh approximately 8" x 12" long.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1811
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2017
Abate by
Aug 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.    4460 Lee Ave., Baton Rouge, LA:  On or about April 13, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees performing stucco/masonry operations from the second buck of scaffold were provided with a ladder to access the working platform.  Employees were observed climbing up the scaffold end frames.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1811
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2017
Abate by
Aug 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.    4460 Lee Ave., Baton Rouge, LA:  On or about April 13, 2017, employees were performing masonry/stucco operations from the second buck of a scaffold that was not equipped with a guardrail system along all open sides of the working platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1811
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2017
Abate by
Aug 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $1,811 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    4460 Lee Ave., Baton Rouge, LA:  On or about April 13, 2017, the employer did not ensure that scaffold being used by the employees to perform mason/stucco operations were inspected by a qualified competent person prior to the start of the shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1811
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2017
Abate by
Aug 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  4460 Lee Ave., Baton Rouge, LA:  On or about April 13, 2017, the employer did not ensure that a qualified competent person supervised the erection of the scaffold system employees were working from to perform masonry/stucco operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2017
Abate by
Aug 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  4460 Lee Ave., Baton Rouge, LA:  On or about April 13, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees performing masonry/stucco operations from a scaffold were trained by a qualified person to recognize hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.454 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2017
Abate by
Aug 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  4460 Lee Ave., Baton Rouge, LA:  On or about April 13, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees erecting a scaffold system were trained by a qualified competent person to recognize hazards associated with the work in question.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Supreme Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342246667.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.