Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EJ DAIRY MARKETING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EJ DAIRY MARKETING, INC. in N15681 TIEMAN AVE, THORP, WI 54771 (NAICS 424430). OSHA activity number 342255742.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch EJ Dairy Marketing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EJ Dairy Marketing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
N15681 TIEMAN AVE
City
THORP
State
WI
ZIP
54771
Mailing
P.O. BOX 628, MARATHON, WI 54448
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424430
Employees
56
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,605 · Current $5,323 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided and used as necessary by reason of chemical hazards encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:    (a) Throughout the production area; Personal protective equipment was not provided and worn during forklift battery servicing operations to protect employees' eyes, faces, arms, and bodies.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5323
  • — Z (S) $7605

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  (a) Throughout the production area; A hazard assessment was not completed to determine what personal protective equipment would be required for protection against hazards present, while employees serviced forklift batteries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  (a) Production room; A quick drench or eye flushing station was not readily available in the area where forklift batteries were serviced.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Abate by
Oct 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,549 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:    (a) Throughout the facility; Each forklift operator was not trained and evaluated prior to operating forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3549
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were maintained in a legible condition:  (a) Production (cutting) area; The nameplate and capacity markings on a Yale forklift (Model ERC045-VGN36TF086) were covered by a sticker.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View EJ Dairy Marketing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342255742.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.