Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EAST MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of EAST MANUFACTURING CORPORATION in 1871 STATE ROUTE 44, RANDOLPH, OH 44265 (NAICS 336212). OSHA activity number 342272713.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch East Manufacturing Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for East Manufacturing Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1871 STATE ROUTE 44
City
RANDOLPH
State
OH
ZIP
44265
Mailing
1871 STATE ROUTE 44, RANDOLPH, OH 44265
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336212
Employees
500
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2017
Abate by
Jul 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $9,959
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    On or about April 24th, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that machine specific procedures were developed and followed where employees were changing out the blade of the Powermatic Houdaille table saw(Serial #797200511), located in the saw room.  Employees are changing out the saw blade by turning off the machine but not turning off the main disconnect switch or locking out any components of the table saw or at the main disconnect.  The last time a saw blade was changed out in the manner was sometime in February of 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9959
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2017
Abate by
Jul 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,959 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:    On or about April 24th, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that employees were applying lock out tag out procedures when changing out the blade of the Powermatic Houdaille table saw(Serial #797200511), located in the saw room.  Employees are changing out the saw blade by turning off the machine but not turning off the main disconnect switch or locking out any components of the table saw or at the main disconnect.  The last time a saw blade was changed out in the manner was sometime in February of 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9959

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2017
Abate by
Jul 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $7,605 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about April 24, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that guarding was in place on the Powermatic Houdaille Table Saw located in the Saw Room (Serial #797200511).  Employees are exposed to hazards such as but not limited to:  the point of operation, flying chips and kick back of the material being cut.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7605
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.133 A03

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2017
Abate by
Jul 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wore prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involved eye hazards wore eye protection that incorporated the prescription in its design, or wore eye protection that could be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses.  On or about April 24, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that employees who were required to wear protective eyewear were wearing safety rated prescription eyewear or safety eyewear that fits over top of their personal prescription eyewear.  Employees were found wearing non safety prescription eye wear with ineffective slip on side shield guarding in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View East Manufacturing Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342272713.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.