BRIDGEPORT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: OPTION IMPROVEMENT, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of OPTION IMPROVEMENT, LLC in 1070 MAIN ST., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342273547.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OPTION IMPROVEMENT, LLC
- Site address
- 1070 MAIN ST.
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06604
- Mailing
- 1120 PROPECT ST., EWING, NJ 08638
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- May 2, 2017
- Abate by
- May 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working on the commercial flat roof were protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets, personal fall arrest systems or a monitoring system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1901.2
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 2, 2017
- Abate by
- May 26, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work on the roof at a height above 6 feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- May 2, 2017
- Abate by
- May 12, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $1,141 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees were provided with a stairway or ladder at each roof location where the break in elevation exceeded 19 inches.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1141
- · Z (S) $1630
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342273547.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.