Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: ANDREW WARD

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANDREW WARD in 2006 W JOHN STREET, CHAMPAIGN, IL 61821 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342286663.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Andrew Ward for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Andrew Ward is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ANDREW WARD
Site address
2006 W JOHN STREET
City
CHAMPAIGN
State
IL
ZIP
61821
Mailing
904 BRITTA LN., GENEVA, IL 60134
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Aug 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:       On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall and struck by hazards on a construction site in Champaign, IL and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1358
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Aug 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)     On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall and struck by hazards on a construction site in Champaign, IL and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the job site for unsafe activity and took necessary steps to eliminate or control fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Aug 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:       On or about April 27, 2017, An employee was exposed to a struck by hazards on a construction site in Champaign, IL and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1358
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Aug 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.     On or about April 27, 2017, An employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard in the eye while using a pneumatic nail gun, on a construction site in Champaign, IL and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.       On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 32ft. on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure the use of fall protection.
Recent events (3)
  • · P (S) $1901.5
  • · I (S) $1901.5
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:       On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (3)
  • · P (S) $0
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):  The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:       On or about April 27, 2017, The employer did not maintain documentation of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (3)
  • · P (S) $0
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Aug 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:       On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure the extension ladder extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1358
  • · Z (S) $2716

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2017
Abate by
Sep 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:      On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • · P (S) $0
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342286663.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.