CHAMPAIGN, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: ANDREW WARD
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANDREW WARD in 2006 W JOHN STREET, CHAMPAIGN, IL 61821 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342286663.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANDREW WARD
- Site address
- 2006 W JOHN STREET
- City
- CHAMPAIGN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61821
- Mailing
- 904 BRITTA LN., GENEVA, IL 60134
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall and struck by hazards on a construction site in Champaign, IL and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1358
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall and struck by hazards on a construction site in Champaign, IL and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the job site for unsafe activity and took necessary steps to eliminate or control fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: On or about April 27, 2017, An employee was exposed to a struck by hazards on a construction site in Champaign, IL and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1358
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On or about April 27, 2017, An employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard in the eye while using a pneumatic nail gun, on a construction site in Champaign, IL and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 32ft. on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure the use of fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $1901.5
- · I (S) $1901.5
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee: On or about April 27, 2017, The employer did not maintain documentation of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure the extension ladder extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1358
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jul 20, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: On or about April 27, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · P (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342286663.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.