DAYVILLE, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: KIMBAL SHEFFIELD, DDS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KIMBAL SHEFFIELD, DDS, LLC in 1040 NORTH MAIN STREET, DAYVILLE, CT 06241 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 342288263.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KIMBAL SHEFFIELD, DDS, LLC
- Site address
- 1040 NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- DAYVILLE
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06241
- Mailing
- 1040 NORTH MAIN STREET, DAYVILLE, CT 06241
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621210
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 IV
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $1,141 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually: COMPANY-WIDE: On or about May 1, 2017, the employer had not reviewed and updated the written Exposure Control Plan since at least 2008. The employer is a dentist and employees are responsible for transporting contaminated used dental instruments and preparing them for sterilization.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1141
- · Z (S) $1630
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure: OPERATORIES: On or about and at times prior to May 1, 2017, the employer had not developed and implemented adequate engineering and work practice controls to ensure that employees who handled contaminated dental instruments prior to sterilization were protected against exposures to blood-borne pathogens when: 1. Transporting contaminated reusable dental instruments from the operatories to the sterilization areas on open trays or paper "slings". 2. Manually transferring contaminated reusable dental instruments into the ultrasonic bath and removing them from the bath to pouches for placement in the autoclave.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1901.2
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1030 D02 VIII
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(viii): Immediately or as soon as possible after use, contaminated reusable sharps were not placed in appropriate containers until properly reprocessed: OPERATORIES AND STERILIZATION AREAS: On or about and at times prior to May 1, 2017, the employer did not provide proper containers for transporting contaminated reusable dental instruments to the sterilization areas. Employees used flat plastic trays with shallow sides or paper "slings" to carry the instruments.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 D04 II E
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(ii)(E): Reusable sharps that were contaminated with blood or other potentially infectious material were not stored or processed in a manner that required employees to reach by hand into the containers where these sharps had been placed: STERILIZATION AREAS: On or about and at times prior to May 1, 2017, employees removed contaminated reusable sharps from the ultrasound bath using gloved hands rather than tongs or other tools. The gloves used were disposable nitrile exam gloves which were not puncture resistant.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 II B
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(B): The employer did not ensure that the training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at least annually: COMPANY-WIDE: On or about and at times prior to May 1, 2017, the employer did not provide annual training on blood-borne pathogens and the exposure control plan to his employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1901.2
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $1,141 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: OPERATORIES AND STERILIZATION AREAS: On or about and at times prior to May 1, 2017, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program to address the hazards associated with the chemicals they use for cleaning and disinfecting equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1141
- · Z (S) $1630
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621210)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342288263.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.