Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: VALLEY AGRONOMICS LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of VALLEY AGRONOMICS LLC in 520 E MOODY ROAD, REXBURG, ID 83440 (NAICS 424910). OSHA activity number 342290871.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Valley Agronomics LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Valley Agronomics LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
520 E MOODY ROAD
City
REXBURG
State
ID
ZIP
83440
Mailing
520 E. MOODY ROAD, REXBURG, ID 83440
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424910
Employees
2000
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $12,675
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following: (A) A specific statement of the intended use of the procedure; (B) Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy; (C) Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them; and (D) Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.  (a) On or about April 27, 2017 and at times prior, employees are required to service and/or clear jams on the augers.   Abatement certification and documentation ARE required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $12675
  • · Z (S) $12675

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 45 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed.  (a) On or about April 27, 2017 and at times prior, the employer has a Lockout/Tagout program with an effective date of September 20, 2012 and has not done an annual review.  Abatement certification and documentation ARE required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:  (a)  On or about April 27, 2017 and at times prior thereto, employees are clearing jams on the augers without understanding the purpose and/or function of the energy control program.  Abatement certification and documentation ARE required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jul 10, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $6,338 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  (a)  On or about April 27, 2017, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have two (2) augers sufficiently guarded and the product being unloaded from the rail cars would push the grate off exposing employees to the rotating auger.   Note: Abatement certification and documentation ARE required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6338
  • · Z (S) $12675

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342290871.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.