MENTOR, OH —
OSHA Inspection: CORE-TECH ENTERPRISES, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CORE-TECH ENTERPRISES, LLC in 7850 ENTERPRISE DR, MENTOR, OH 44060 (NAICS 333511). OSHA activity number 342297835.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CORE-TECH ENTERPRISES, LLC
- Site address
- 7850 ENTERPRISE DR
- City
- MENTOR
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44060
- Mailing
- 7850 ENTERPRISE DR, MENTOR, OH 44060
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333511
- Employees
- 90
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,169 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer shall establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program shall be updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program. An employee who has not been fit tested or medically cleared is wearing a half mask respirator and is exposed to various chemicals, to include but not limited to Zircwash coating and Alumina Core Paint, while performing the task of spraying and coating parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3169
- — Z (S) $6338
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that employees who are assigned a half mask respirator were evaluated and fit tested prior to their usage. An employee who has not been fit tested was wearing a half mask respirator and is exposed to various chemicals, to include but not limited to Zircwash coating and Alumina Core Paint, while performing the task of spraying and coating parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedures and employee training to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, start up or release of stored energy could occur: On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to establish and implement a Control of Hazardous Energy Program. Employees who are tasked with the servicing and repair of various machinery, including but not limited to the mold machines and dust collectors, are not trained as authorized to perform lock out tag out.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $4,437 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from the hazard of point of operation and moving parts. Employees are exposed to an unguarded vertical band saw blade (Jet, serial #13022525) of approximately 4 inches of the 6 inch saw blade, when using the saw to cut rigid ceramic mold cores.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4437
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.213 D01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,387 · Current $2,693 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1) Each circular crosscut table saw shall be guarded by a hood which shall meet all the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this section for hoods for circular ripsaws. On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that a Craftsman 10 in. table saw blade was guarded by a hood to protect employees from the hazard of coming into contact with the unprotected saw blade.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2693
- — Z (S) $5387
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $3,169 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): At this establishment, the employer had not developed, implemented, and maintained at the workplace a written hazard communication program for which describes how the criteria specified in 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met for employees exposed to chemicals: On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to develop and implement a written Hazard Communication program where employees are exposed, either by working with or near, various chemicals to include but not limited to Dynasylan Silbound H-25 and Zircwash.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3169
- — Z (S) $6338
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to issue Appendix D to employees who voluntarily use various types of respirators, to include but not limited to standard dust masks. The employer provides dust masks to employees for their personal use in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $711 · Current $355 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): Where the employer has provided portable fire extinguishers for employee use in the workplace, the employer shall also provide an educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to provide training on the safe use of a portable fire extinguisher to employees, where employees are expected and allowed to use in the event of an incipient stage fire.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $355
- — Z (O) $711
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Services, feeders, and branch circuits. Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, shall be legibly marked to indicate its purpose, unless located and arranged so the purpose is evident. On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the electrical panel boxes were marked and identified as required in the main facility. The panel boxes contained no identification markings on the majority of those located in the main facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.305 B02 II
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(ii): Where a fixture canopy or pan was used, the combustible wall or ceiling finish exposed between the edge of the canopy or pan and the outlet box was not covered with noncombustible material: On or about May 3, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the electrical panel boxes were covered as required in the main facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Core-Tech Enterprises, LLC
View Core-Tech Enterprises, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333511)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342297835.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.