Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JF EXTERIOR & REMODELING LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JF EXTERIOR & REMODELING LLC in 504 PINE STREET, MADISON, WI 53715 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342298155.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JF Exterior & Remodeling LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JF Exterior & Remodeling LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
504 PINE STREET
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53715
Mailing
4709 COTTAGE GROVE ROAD APT. #2, MADISON, WI 53716
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    On or about May 3, 2017, and times prior, the employer did not initiate and maintain safety and health programs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1358
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2017
Abate by
Jun 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about May 3, 2017, and times prior, the employer did not instruct each employee on the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to the work environment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A02 VIII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2017
Abate by
Jul 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(viii): The employer shall assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified in the following areas: The standards contained in subpart M.    On or about May 3, 2017, the employees on site were not familiar with the OSHA fall protection standards and the requirements held within.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2017
Abate by
May 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): An employee was permitted to work in proximity to an electric power circuit that the employee could contact in the course of work and was not protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means:     On or about May 3, 2017, employees performing residential roofing activities such as but not limited to tear-off and re-shingling were exposed to a 120/240v electrical service line due to no guarding or de-energizing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1358
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2017
Abate by
May 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    On or about May 3, 2017, employees performing tear-off and re-shingling on a residential roof at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1901.5
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 15, 2017
Abate by
May 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and bottom of ladders was not kept clear:    On or about May 3, 2017, employees utilizing a portable metal extension ladder for access to a residential rooftop were doing so with the bottom of the ladder not clear of debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2173

View JF Exterior & Remodeling LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342298155.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.