WEST ROXBURY, MA —
OSHA Inspection: INFINITY ROOFING INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of INFINITY ROOFING INC in 5-11 CASS STREET, WEST ROXBURY, MA 02132 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342299195.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INFINITY ROOFING INC
- Site address
- 5-11 CASS STREET
- City
- WEST ROXBURY
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02132
- Mailing
- 7 SOUTH HIGH STREET APT. 1, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,309 · Current $1,995 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Jobsite: building #5-7: On, or about, 02/27/2017 employees were hoisting bundles of roofing tiles to rooftop and exposed to falling materials whereby head protection was not worn by the ground crew.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1995
- — Z (S) $2309
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: On, or about, 02/27/2017 employees performing construction activities were not protected by a guardrail system, net system, or personal fall protection exposing the employees to a fall of approximately 26 feet in the following instances: (a) Building 5-7: Employees were relocating roofing material from the power ladder to the far end of the building without the use of fall protection. (b) Building 9-11: Employees were installing roof sheathing and barrier paper without the use of fall protection. (c) Building 15-17: An employee was installing a ridge cap without the use of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3803
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Establishment: On, or about, 02/27/2017 the employer did not provide fall protection training for all employees potentially exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: On, or about, 02/27/2017 the rooftop access ladder siderails did not extend at least three feet above upper landing surface in the following instances: (a) Building 9-11 - the extension ladder siderails did not extend at least three feet beyond the upper landing surface. (b) Building 15-17 - the extension ladder did not extend at least three feet beyond upper landing surface whereby the ladder was not secured at the top and a grasping device was not installed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B07
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(7): Care was not exercised in placing, lashing, or holding a ladder with slip-resistant feet that was used on a slippery surface: Jobsite, Building 5-7: On, or about, 02/27/2017 the footing of the aluminum extension ladder was placed on nylon tarp and debris creating a slippery surface whereas the ladder was not secured to prevent accidental displacement exposing the employees to a fall of approximately 26 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and bottom of ladders was not kept clear: Jobsite, Building 5-7: On, or about, 02/27/2017 the area around and under the base of the aluminum access ladder was littered with discarded roofing material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2716
More inspections at Infinity Roofing INC
View Infinity Roofing INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342299195.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.