Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: LIONHEART INDUSTRIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LIONHEART INDUSTRIES, INC. in 601 NORTH ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL, ORLANDO, FL 32805 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 342299716.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lionheart Industries, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lionheart Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
601 NORTH ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL
City
ORLANDO
State
FL
ZIP
32805
Mailing
243 TIMBERLAND AVENUE, LONGWOOD, FL 32750
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  a) Plating Areas - No respirator program was developed and respirator usage was required by the employer, on or about May 4, 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $815
  • · Z (S) $1630

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Plating Areas - No medical evaluations were conducted and respirator usage was required by the employer, on or about May 4, 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   a) Plating Areas - No fit tests were conducted and respirator usage was required by the employer, on or about May 4, 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) Zinc and Cadmium Tank Area - An employee was allowed to have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece on the 3M 6000 Series half-face dual cartridge respirator and the face, on or about May 4, 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  a) Zinc and Cadmium Tank Area - A circuit breaker panel had an exposed live busbar on the front in 3 areas due to missing breaker switches, on or about June 22, 2017.  b) Zinc and Cadmium Tank Area - A circuit breaker panel had 2 open holes on the side, on or about June 22, 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1901.5
  • · Z (S) $3803

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  a) Zinc and Cadmium Tank Area - No initial determination was conducted for hexavalent chromium exposure, on or about May 4, 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342299716.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.