TOLEDO, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: GRANITE PALACE TOPS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GRANITE PALACE TOPS in 1630 COINING DR., TOLEDO, OH 43612 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 342306909.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GRANITE PALACE TOPS
- Site address
- 1630 COINING DR.
- City
- TOLEDO
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43612
- Mailing
- 1630 COINING DR., TOLEDO, OH 43612
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A03
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(3): (3) Walking-working surfaces were not maintained free of hazards such as sharp or protruding objects, loose boards, corrosion, leaks, spills, snow, and ice. a.) On or about May 8, 2017, the employer failed to the keep walking working area around the bridge saw free of hazards. The water recycling pit which was six feet long by three feet wide and approximately 4 feet deep was uncovered.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a.) On or about May 8, 2017, the employer failed to provide employees who voluntarily wore tight fitting elastomer respirators a medical evaluation to determine if the employees were fit to wear a respirator. The employees voluntarily wore the respirators while performing small cuts/notches in granite and stone material.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $815
- · Z (S) $1630
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that ensured that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of at least the following elements: Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and how to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators: a.) On or about May 8, 2017, the employer failed to provide training on the necessity of a respirator, how to recognize the limitations and capabilities of a respirator, and how to inspect and maintain a respirator to employees who were voluntarily wearing an elastomeric half face respirator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: a.) On or about May 8, 2017, the employer failed to provide Appendix D of the respiratory protection standard to employees who wore filtering face piece respirators (dust masks) voluntarily.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a.) On or about May 8, 2017 the employer did not ensure that an employee operating the Nissan forklift is competent to complete the task. The employer did not ensure that the forklift operator received formal instructions and practical training on how to operate a powered industrial vehicle, as well as evaluate the operator's performance.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1358
- · Z (S) $2716
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
00402460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a.) On or about May 8, 2017, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees who work with hazardous materials including but not limited to acetone and toluene.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $815
- · Z (S) $1630
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
00402460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: a) On or about May 8, 2017 the employer did not have safety data sheets for all hazardous chemicals used in the facility. Employees working in the facility were exposed to paints and hardeners containing hazardous chemicals including but not limited to acetone and toluene.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
00402460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a.) On or about May 8, 2017, the employer did not train employees on the hazards of the chemicals they were working with. Employees working in the facility were exposed to hazardous materials including but not limited to acetone and toluene.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Sep 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9015
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a.) On or about May 8, 2017, the employer failed to conduct exposure monitoring to determine employees exposure to respirable dust and silica while working in the production area cutting and polishing granite and stone.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342306909.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.