OSHA Inspection: DANIEL CUEVAS

Issued

2017-08-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-09-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.    (a)  The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violation that was issued by the Agency.

Issued

2017-05-19 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1630.00 · Current $1630.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): At this job site, employees exposed to possible head injury from falling or flying objects or from impact with hand tools, equipment and building materials during construction operations were not wearing hard hats.    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using head protection while working under personnel, materials, and equipment.

Issued

2017-05-19 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    (a) Employees conducting roofing operations on a 5:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling to the lower level.

Issued

2017-05-19 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-07-07 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not train each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    (a)The employer did not ensure that employees were trained to recognize and protect themselves from fall hazards. Employees conducting roofing operations on a 5:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling to the lower level.