Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: BRUCE TAPPAN

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of BRUCE TAPPAN in FOX RIDGE ROAD, HORSEHEADS, NY 14845 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342324019.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bruce Tappan for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bruce Tappan is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BRUCE TAPPAN
Site address
FOX RIDGE ROAD
City
HORSEHEADS
State
NY
ZIP
14845
Mailing
139 DURLAND PLACE, WATKINS GLEN, NY 14891
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.303 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.303(b)(1): Grinding machines were not equipped with safety guards in conformance with the requirements of ANSI B7.1-1970, Safety Code for the Use, Care, and Protection of abrasive wheels, and paragraph (d) of this section:    a)  At the jobsite, on or about 4/27/17:  A worker was using a hand held grinder to cut masonry veneer without a guard on the grinder.
Recent events (3)
  • · J (S) $400
  • · C (S) $3259
  • · Z (S) $3259

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    a)  At the jobsite, on or about 4/27/17:  An employee was working from a scaffold platform approximately 13 feet above ground and where that platform was not fully planked between the uprights.
Recent events (3)
  • · J (S) $400
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    a)  At the jobsite, on or about 4/27/17:  An employee was accessing a blue tubular welded frame (narrow format) scaffold platform approximately 13 feet above ground without fall protection of any kind.    b)  At the jobsite, on or about 4/27/17:  An employee was working from a blue tubular welded frame (narrow format) scaffold platform on brackets approximately 13 feet above ground without fall protection on the open end.      c)  At the jobsite, on or about 4/27/17:  An employee was working from a tubular welded frame (6' walk thru) scaffold platform where there was no mid-rail.
Recent events (3)
  • · J (S) $400
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    a)  At the jobsite, on or about 4/27/17:  An employee was applying grout to the fascia of the building, from an adjacent 10:12 pitch dormer roof without fall protection.  The employee worked from chicken boards and a roof brow.
Recent events (3)
  • · J (S) $400
  • · C (S) $3803
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a)  At the jobsite, on or about 4/27/17:  An employee was accessing a blue tubular welded frame (narrow format) scaffold platform approximately 13 feet above ground where the ladder used did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing.    b)  At the jobsite, on or about 4/27/17:  An employee was accessing a tubular welded frame (6' walk thru) scaffold platform approximately 13 feet above ground where that ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (3)
  • · J (S) $400
  • · C (S) $2716
  • · Z (S) $2716

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342324019.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.