DACULA, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: HALLMARK ROOFING & SHEET METAL
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HALLMARK ROOFING & SHEET METAL in 3585 BRASELTON HIGHWAY, DACULA, GA 30019 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342324340.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HALLMARK ROOFING & SHEET METAL
- Site address
- 3585 BRASELTON HIGHWAY
- City
- DACULA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30019
- Mailing
- 709 OAKLAND AVE #A, WEST COLUMBIA, SC 29169
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards associated with fiberglass step ladders used to support a scaffold work platform: On or about May 12, 2017, at 3585 Braselton Hwy, Dacula, Georgia: An employee performing roofing work was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 8-11-feet when he worked from a ladder scaffold work platform that was not secured to the ladders, was not extended at least six inches over the centerline support, and one ladder was not set upon a firm foundation when a piece of wood was placed under one of the ladder's feet. Among other possible methods to abate this violation, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to follow the requirements of ANSI/ASSE A10.8-2011 Section 17.2.7 which states that planks and platforms shall be securely fastened to the supporting members to prevent lateral movement, and shall overhang the supporting member.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2173
- · Z (S) $3622
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to impalement hazards from uncovered steel posts. On or about May 12, 2017, at 3585 Braselton Hwy, Dacula, Georgia: Two employees performing roofing work were exposed to impalement hazards when one of the employees worked from on top of a roof without using fall protection above another employee working from a ladder scaffold that was approximately 2.5-feet above and approximately 4-feet behind uncovered steel fence posts. Among other possible methods to abate this violation, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to cover the steel fence posts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2173
- · Z (S) $3622
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about May 12, 2017, at 3585 Braselton Hwy, Dacula, Georgia: An employee performing roofing work was exposed to struck-by hazards of falling roof panels handled by the employee working above him from the roof while he worked beneath the employee from a scaffold platform without wearing head protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1304
- · Z (S) $2173
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. On or about May 12, 2017, at 3585 Braselton Hwy, Dacula, Georgia: An employee performing roofing work was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11.5-feet when he worked while lying on top of an unprotected edge of a roof without using fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2173
- · Z (S) $3622
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) On or about May 12, 2017, at 3585 Braselton Hwy, Dacula, Georgia: An employee performing roofing work was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11.5-feet when the employer did not instruct the employee how to recognize and minimize fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2173
- · Z (S) $3622
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342324340.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.