Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: FLEX COURT ATHLETICS, A DIVISION OF PLASTIC PARTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FLEX COURT ATHLETICS, A DIVISION OF PLASTIC PARTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. in 4328 US-34, KEWANEE, IL 61443 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 342327798.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flex Court Athletics, a Division of Plastic Parts International, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flex Court Athletics, a Division of Plastic Parts International, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4328 US-34
City
KEWANEE
State
IL
ZIP
61443
Mailing
1248 SHAPPERT DR. ATT: SCOTT DANIELSON, MACHESNEY PARK, IL 61115
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $869 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(1): The spraybooth was not substantially constructed of steel, securely and rigidly supported, or of concrete or masonry.    Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were conducting the spray operations in a booth the employer had created using industrial racking and wood framing covered in plastic.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $869.2
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.107 C08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(8): Portable lamp(s) were used in the spraying area(s) during spraying operations:  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were conducting the spray operations and portable lamps were used within the spraying area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 D07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(7): Exhaust ducts were not constructed of steel:  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were conducting the spray operations and the exhaust ducting included wooden framing, plastic tubing and furnace filters.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 F04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $869 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(f)(4): An adequate supply of suitable portable fire extinguishers were not installed near all spraying areas:     Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were spraying flammable materials and the employer had one portable fire extinguisher that had last been inspected in 1990.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $869.2
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.107 G07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "NO SMOKING" sign(s) in large letters on contrasting color backgrounds were not conspicuously posted at spraying area(s) and paint storage room(s):  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were conducting the spray operations and the employer had not posted No Smoking signs in the spray area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $652 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were required to wear respiratory protection and the employer had not established and implemented a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $652
  • · Z (S) $1630

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were required to wear respiratory protection and the employer had not provided the employee with a medical evaluation prior to requiring use of the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were required to wear respiratory protection and the employer had not conducted fit-testing prior to requiring use of the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were required to wear respiratory protection and the employer had not identified and evaluated the respiratory hazards associated with the spray finishing
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse were required to wear respiratory protection and the employer had not conducted training prior to requiring use of the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,086 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of athletic floor tiles used Sher-Wood HF Fast Catalyst, a corrosive chemical, and the employer did not provide facilities for quick drenching of the eyes and body for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1086.4
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,086 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Employees using a Ryobi portable table saw to trim cardboard corner protection for pallets of material were exposed to the point of operation of the saw because the saw was not equipped with a guard over the blade.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1086.4
  • · Z (S) $2716

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $869 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse used several chemicals, including but not limited to Sher-Wood HF Fast Catalyst and Sher-Wood Post CAT Clear HF 90 Gloss and the employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $869.2
  • · Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse used several chemicals, including but not limited to Sher-Wood HF Fast Catalyst and Sher-Wood Post CAT Clear HF 90 Gloss and the employer did not maintain safety data sheets for each chemical that were readily accessible.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv):  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse used several chemicals, including but not limited to Sher-Wood HF Fast Catalyst and Sher-Wood Post CAT Clear HF 90 Gloss and the employer did not ensure employees were trained on the measures to protect themselves from the hazards of the chemicals prior to using them in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2): The employer did not provide employees with effective information on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area:  Employees engaged in spray finishing operations of the athletic floor tiles in the warehouse used several chemicals, including but not limited to Sher-Wood HF Fast Catalyst and Sher-Wood Post CAT Clear HF 90 Gloss and the employer did not ensure employees were trained on the hazards of the chemicals prior to using them in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342327798.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.