NEW HAVEN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: BIONDI, PAUL
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BIONDI, PAUL in 81 DIXWELL AVE, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342334729.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BIONDI, PAUL
- Site address
- 81 DIXWELL AVE
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06511
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 486, NORTH HAVEN, CT 06473
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person. Jobsite: The employer had not established and implemented a safety program including frequent jobsite inspections and training for employees working on the flat roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1100
- · Z (S) $2173
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. Jobsite: The employees who were working on the flat roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2716
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342334729.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.